Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has firmly rejected U.S. pressure to increase Australia’s defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, standing his ground on maintaining the country’s autonomy in national security decisions.
At a Glance
- U.S. Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth urged Australia to boost military spending to 3.5% of GDP “as soon as possible”
- Prime Minister Albanese defended Australia’s current target of 2.3% of GDP by 2033
- Increasing to 3.5% would cost approximately 100 billion Australian dollars ($65 billion) annually
- Australia already faces significant budgetary pressures from natural disasters and AUKUS submarine commitments
- Albanese emphasized that defense spending should be based on Australia’s specific needs, not external demands
Albanese Defends Australia’s Sovereign Defense Decisions
During the recent Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese firmly pushed back against calls from the United States to substantially increase Australia’s defense spending. The request came from U.S. Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth, who urged Australia to boost military expenditure to 3.5% of GDP, significantly higher than Australia’s current forecast of 2.33% over the next eight years. Albanese maintained that Australia would make its own determinations about defense spending based on national priorities rather than external pressure.
Albanese articulated a clear stance on Australia’s defense spending approach, emphasizing capability-based planning over arbitrary percentage targets. “What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it,” Albanese told reporters. This statement underscores his government’s commitment to strategic assessment rather than merely meeting percentage benchmarks.
The Prime Minister also noted that Australia is already increasing defense spending by approximately 10 billion Australian dollars ($6.5 billion).
To date this has been Australia's response
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese previously asserted that Australia determines its own national interest regarding defense spending, responding to earlier U.S. pressure in March 2025, as reported by ABC News.
Defence Minister…
— Rave🌏💐🐝🎬🎶🇦🇺 (@Atypicalissue) June 1, 2025
Financial Realities and Strategic Commitments
The financial implications of increasing defense spending to 3.5% of GDP would be substantial, requiring approximately 100 billion Australian dollars ($65 billion) annually. This comes at a time when Australia is already managing significant budgetary pressures due to natural disasters including droughts, floods, and cyclones. Additionally, Australia has committed to substantial spending on US-manufactured nuclear submarines under the AUKUS agreement, potentially costing up to 368 billion Australian dollars ($238 billion) over the life of the program.
Some economists have questioned the necessity of increasing defense expenditure beyond current levels. Matt Grudnoff from the Australia Institute argued that “Australia already spends more than it should” on defence. Even at the current target of 2.3% of GDP, Australia would rank as the ninth largest defense spender globally. This perspective contrasts sharply with pressure from former military chiefs, strategists, and opposition Coalition members who support higher defense spending in response to regional security concerns.
Regional Security Context and International Relations
The debate over Australia’s defense spending occurs against a backdrop of rising global military expenditures, which increased by 9.4% in 2024—the largest jump since the Cold War. Hegseth’s call for increased Australian defense spending follows U.S. warnings about the growing threat posed by China in the Indo-Pacific region. Notably, China’s Defense Minister Dong Jun did not attend the Shangri-La Dialogue, a key regional security forum where these discussions took place.
During the dialogue, Albanese reaffirmed Australia’s position on Taiwan, emphasizing support for the status quo and peaceful resolution of tensions. While maintaining Australia’s strategic alliance with the United States, the Prime Minister’s stance on defense spending indicates a desire to balance international partnerships with domestic policy sovereignty. The Australian government continues to navigate complex regional security dynamics while asserting its right to determine national defense priorities based on its own strategic assessment.
