A 16-year-old California runner is taking legal action against the state’s Attorney General over what she claims are failures to protect female athletes in school sports under Title IX.
At a Glance
- The teenage athlete’s lawsuit targets Attorney General Rob Bonta for allegedly insufficient Title IX enforcement
- The case emerges amid controversial Biden administration proposals to expand Title IX to include gender identity
- The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected the Biden Administration’s attempt to enforce new Title IX rules
- Critics argue proposed changes threaten the viability and fairness of women’s sports
- Multiple educational institutions are currently under investigation for potential Title IX violations
Title IX at the Center of Growing Controversy
The California lawsuit adds to mounting tensions over Title IX interpretation and enforcement across the country. Title IX, a federal civil rights law passed in 1972, prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational institutions receiving federal funding. The Biden administration has proposed significant changes to redefine sex discrimination to include gender identity and sexual orientation for federally funded academic institutions.
A second rule specifically addresses sports and athletic teams, potentially prohibiting blanket bans on transgender athletes participating in sports aligned with their gender identity. Critics have expressed serious concerns about these proposed changes, arguing they fundamentally alter the law’s original intent and could disadvantage female athletes who Title IX was designed to protect.
"Volleyball coach says her home was shot at after speaking out against trans athletes
Former San Jose State volleyball coach Melissa Batie-Smoose claims her home in California was shot at this week – three months after she was suspended in the wake of her complaint about…
— Ronni Nicole #KPSS (@RonniNicole1) February 15, 2025
Expert Concerns Over Rule Changes
Legal experts have raised significant concerns about the proposed Title IX modifications. Jennifer Braceras, a vocal critic of the changes, has pointed out the limited scope of the original legislation, which she believes is being inappropriately expanded.
“Title IX is a very specific statute, and it does only one thing: prohibit schools that accept federal dollars from discriminating on the basis of sex.”, said Jennifer Braceras.
Braceras has further stated that while sex might be irrelevant in academic settings, it is often decisive in athletics due to biological differences. The proposed rule would require schools to create case-by-case guidelines for sports participation, which critics argue would be administratively burdensome and legally risky for educational institutions.
Supreme Court Intervention and Federal Investigations
The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected the Biden Administration’s request to enforce a new Title IX rule that would have allowed transgender students to compete in sports and access facilities according to their gender identity. The rule was scheduled to take effect on August 1, 2024, but was challenged by multiple states. The Court determined that the government had not provided sufficient basis to reverse lower court decisions that deemed the rule likely unlawful.
“Where sex is irrelevant to academics, it is often dispositive with respect to athletics because males have a clear biological advantage.”, Braceras concludes.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Education is investigating potential Title IX violations at several educational institutions, including San Jose State University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association. These investigations follow Executive Order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” and focus on incidents where biological males competed in women’s sports, reportedly leading to unfair competition and safety concerns.
Athletes Speak Out
Former athletes affected by transgender participation policies have begun speaking out. Paula Scanlan, who previously competed on the University of Pennsylvania Women’s Swimming and Diving team alongside transgender athlete Lia Thomas, expressed support for the Department of Education’s investigations. Scanlan described being “forced to compete against and share a locker room with a male athlete” and claimed the university offered psychological services “to attempt to re-educate us to become comfortable with the idea of undressing in front of a male.”
The California student’s lawsuit reflects growing concerns among female athletes about competitive fairness and equal opportunity in school sports. As courts continue to evaluate the legality of proposed Title IX changes, the fundamental question remains: how to balance transgender inclusion with the original purpose of Title IX to protect and advance opportunities for women and girls in educational settings including athletics.
