The House Oversight Committee’s investigation into President Biden’s cognitive decline has taken an explosive turn with the subpoena of Anthony Bernal.
At a Glance
- The House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman Rep. James Comer, issued a subpoena to Anthony Bernal, a former assistant to President Joe Biden.
- The investigation focuses on the alleged cover-up of Biden’s declining cognitive abilities and the legitimacy of some executive actions he took as president.
- Bernal initially agreed to a voluntary interview but refused after the White House Counsel’s Office waived executive privilege.
- Biden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, and former aides Annie Tomasini and Ashley Williams are also scheduled to testify.
- The Oversight Committee is examining who was effectively running the White House, including the use of an autopen for signing documents.
The Subpoena and Investigation
The House Oversight Committee, spearheaded by Rep. James Comer (R-KY), has issued a subpoena to Anthony Bernal. Bernal, who served as an advisor to First Lady Jill Biden, is now thrust into an investigation examining whether the President’s cognitive state was concealed, and its potential impact on the decisions of his administration.
Watch report: GOP probes into alleged cover-up of Biden’s mental health
Bernal’s involvement stems from his close ties with the Bidens, making his testimony crucial to uncovering the truth. Biden’s physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, and former aides are also called to contribute insight into the President’s mental fitness. Rep. Comer accuses Bernal of avoiding transparency, emphasizing the necessity of accountability in this probe.
The White House and Executive Privilege
Initially set for voluntary discussions, Bernal reversed his decision following the White House Counsel’s Office waiving executive privilege. Rep. Comer remarked, “With no privilege left to hide behind, Mr. Bernal is now running scared.” The Committee is determined to overcome any obstruction in acquiring needed information.
These actions underscore escalating tensions between congressional oversight and executive privilege claims. This investigation has triggered broader implications concerning the transparency and decision-making within the Biden administration.
Implications of the Investigation
As the investigation examines who truly ran the White House, it also scrutinizes how policy decisions and document signatures were managed, including the use of an autopen. Former advisor Neera Tanden admitted using this tool, though lacking clarity on the authorizer.
Anticipation builds as Bernal’s deposition approaches, with his contributions potentially pivotal in evaluating the depth of Biden’s cognitive decline and the legitimacy of his policy enactments.
