Congress Eyes Judiciary Changes As Johnson Pushes Back On Anti-Trump Lawfare

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is drawing a sharp line against judges seen as hindering President Donald Trump’s constitutional authority on immigration. In a major shift, Johnson is reminding federal courts that they operate under congressional design — and that lawmakers can redraw boundaries and adjust funding as needed.

Speaking on the issue, Johnson said, “we do have authority over the federal courts, as you know. We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power, funding over the courts and all these other things.” He followed with, “desperate times call for desperate measures and Congress is going to act.”

This message comes as several judges have ruled against Trump’s deportation policies. The administration points to the Alien Enemies Act and Article II powers as grounds for the president’s actions, saying judicial opposition amounts to political obstruction.

Johnson has stopped short of backing impeachment, even as Republicans like Elon Musk have urged it. Instead, his focus has turned toward practical steps Congress can take — including adjusting which courts hear specific types of cases or reducing funds to districts perceived as overstepping.

Several House Republicans are reportedly drafting legislation aimed at curbing court interference. That includes proposals to consolidate jurisdictions or move key immigration cases out of certain court regions.

Supporters of Johnson’s approach argue that courts are no longer acting as neutral legal bodies but have become entrenched in partisan efforts to delay or overturn Trump’s agenda. They say this represents an abuse of judicial power and a threat to constitutional balance.

Inside the administration, officials are urging quick action to prevent additional rulings that could weaken executive authority in the months ahead. Some believe the battle could set long-term precedents.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR