How Long Did They KNOW – And Say NOTHING?

Charlamagne Tha God slammed Rep. Eric Swalwell and the Democratic Party over the alleged Biden health cover-up, questioning how Americans could ever trust them again after “they lied for so long” about the president’s condition.

At a Glance

  • Charlamagne Tha God confronted Rep. Eric Swalwell on “The Breakfast Club” about Democrats covering up Biden’s apparent mental decline
  • Swalwell claimed he wasn’t “behind the scenes” with Biden and denied widespread knowledge of the president’s condition
  • The radio host later called out Swalwell for dishonesty, saying “cut the f— out” regarding claims of ignorance about Biden’s health
  • Charlamagne criticized mainstream media outlets like CNN for waiting too long to address Biden’s condition
  • Co-host Andrew Schulz noted that Democrats currently in power “can’t be trusted” after their handling of Biden’s health issues

Democrats’ Credibility Under Fire

Radio personality Charlamagne Tha God didn’t hold back when questioning Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell about his party’s honesty regarding President Biden’s health. During a heated exchange on “The Breakfast Club,” Charlamagne directly challenged the California representative on what many conservatives have long suspected – that Democratic leaders knew about Biden’s cognitive decline but concealed it from voters. The confrontation highlights growing criticism from voices outside conservative media about the apparent disconnect between Biden’s public appearances and Democrats’ previous assurances about his fitness for office.

Swalwell attempted to distance himself from any alleged cover-up, claiming limited behind-the-scenes access to the president. When Charlamagne suggested that Democrats as a whole were complicit in misleading Americans about Biden’s condition, Swalwell responded, “I don’t think so, I hope not.” The congressman pivoted to discussing healthcare as a key issue Democrats should focus on for the future, but Charlamagne wasn’t satisfied with what appeared to be deflection tactics rather than addressing the transparency concerns.

“Cut the F— Out” – Follow-Up Criticism

Following the interview, Charlamagne expressed even stronger frustration on his “Brilliant Idiots” podcast, accusing Swalwell of dishonesty in claiming ignorance about Biden’s condition. The radio host rejected the congressman’s assertion that he had limited exposure to Biden’s health status, pointing out that Biden’s apparent decline was visible to anyone with “the same eyes, the same ears.” This escalation shows the interview touched a nerve with Charlamagne, who felt Swalwell’s answers represented exactly the kind of political evasiveness that has damaged public trust.

“I don’t think many of us were behind the scenes, to be honest. I didn’t spend much time with President Biden behind the scenes.”, said Eric Swalwell.

Comedian Andrew Schulz, who co-hosts with Charlamagne, backed up these criticisms, saying bluntly that current Democrats in power simply “can’t be trusted.” The conversation referenced Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book “Original Sin,” which details Biden’s alleged decline and the efforts to shield it from public scrutiny. This growing mistrust spans beyond just Biden’s health to question whether Democrats are being forthright on other issues as well, presenting a credibility challenge as the party prepares for upcoming elections.

Media Accountability Under Scrutiny

Charlamagne didn’t limit his criticism to politicians, taking aim at mainstream media outlets for their role in what he sees as a coordinated effort to protect Biden. He specifically called out CNN’s Jake Tapper for addressing Biden’s condition only after it became impossible to ignore. Schulz highlighted what they perceive as a double standard where legacy media outlets face less accountability than independent podcasters when they get stories wrong or mislead their audiences. The conversation demonstrates how trust in traditional information gatekeepers continues to erode.

The exchange has garnered significant attention for revealing divisions that transcend typical partisan lines. Charlamagne’s forceful questioning of a Democratic congressman, combined with his criticism of mainstream media outlets traditionally aligned with Democratic messaging, signals growing dissatisfaction with institutional dishonesty regardless of political affiliation. As information about Biden’s health continues to emerge, these conversations raise important questions about transparency in both politics and media that will likely persist through future election cycles.