Moscow Airports SHUTTERED – Huge Attack!

Moscow’s four international airports shut down temporarily after a massive Ukrainian drone attack, challenging Russia’s security just days before planned Victory Day celebrations.

At a Glance

  • Russian forces intercepted over 100 Ukrainian drones targeting Moscow and multiple regions, forcing closure of all four major Moscow airports
  • The attacks occurred just days before Russia’s May 9 Victory Day celebrations, where Chinese President Xi Jinping is expected to attend
  • President Putin proposed a 3-day ceasefire starting May 8, while Ukraine’s Zelenskyy called it “theatrical” and demanded a more substantial 30-day pause
  • No casualties were reported from the Moscow attacks, though drone debris landed on highways
  • Both Ukraine and Russia continue to launch drone strikes against each other, with casualties reported in Ukrainian cities

Moscow Airports Shuttered as Drones Target Russian Capital

All four international airports around Moscow temporarily suspended flights Tuesday as Russian air defenses intercepted 19 drones targeting the capital region. The widespread attack forced the closure of not only Moscow’s major airports but also nine regional Russian airports, significantly disrupting civilian air travel. The Russian Defense Ministry reported that their forces intercepted more than 100 Ukrainian drones targeting nearly a dozen Russian regions in what appears to be one of the largest drone operations against Russian territory.

While no casualties were reported in Moscow from the attacks, drone debris landed on highways around the capital, creating potential hazards for motorists. Russian authorities quickly mobilized emergency responses, implementing heightened security protocols that included potential internet restrictions in some areas and a ban on fireworks during the upcoming Victory Day celebrations. The attacks represent a significant escalation in Ukraine’s ability to strike deep within Russian territory.

Victory Day Celebrations in Jeopardy

The timing of the drone attacks is particularly significant as they occurred just days before Russia’s planned Victory Day celebrations on May 9, commemorating the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany in World War II. Chinese President Xi Jinping is expected to attend the celebrations in Moscow, highlighting the diplomatic importance of the event for Russia. The Ukrainian attacks appear deliberately timed to disrupt these preparations and cast doubt on Russia’s security capabilities.

“Our position is very simple for all countries travelling to Russia on 9 May: we cannot be held responsible for what happens on the territory of the Russian Federation. They are responsible for your safety. We will not provide any guarantees, because we do not know what Russia might do on those dates.”, said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Ukraine’s foreign ministry has urged foreign states not to participate in the Moscow parade, viewing it as an insult to the memory of those who fought against Nazism. Ukrainian officials specifically stated that participation by foreign military personnel would be “an affront to the memory of the victory over Nazism, to the memory of millions of Ukrainian front-line soldiers who liberated our country and all of Europe from Nazism eight decades ago.” This statement further intensifies the political significance of the drone strikes.

Disputed Ceasefire Proposals Amid Escalating Conflict

Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed a three-day ceasefire starting May 8, which would coincide with the Victory Day celebrations. The Kremlin described this brief pause as being declared “on humanitarian grounds.” However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy dismissed Russia’s proposal as “theatrical” and insufficient, instead calling for a more substantial 30-day ceasefire as initially proposed by the United States. This standoff over ceasefire terms reflects the deep distrust between the warring parties.

“Fire will be halted, but should the Kyiv regime fail to do the same and should it continue trying to strike our positions and facilities, then an appropriate response will be given immediately”, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

Despite the diplomatic impasse, both sides recently conducted a large prisoner exchange, with each receiving 205 soldiers in a swap mediated by the United Arab Emirates. This rare cooperative action stands in stark contrast to the ongoing drone warfare and suggests that some lines of communication remain open between Moscow and Kyiv, even as their long-range strikes against each other’s territory continue with growing intensity and technological sophistication.

Civilian Casualties Mount on Both Sides

While Moscow escaped casualties from the recent drone attacks, Ukrainian cities continue to suffer from Russian drone strikes. In Odesa, a Russian drone strike killed at least one person and damaged infrastructure. Kharkiv’s mayor reported Russian drone strikes injuring at least four people and causing fires in residential areas. In Kramatorsk, Russian drones killed one person and injured two others, targeting both residential and industrial zones. These attacks on civilian targets have intensified as both sides utilize increasingly sophisticated drone technology.

The Ukrainian military reported 200 combat engagements with Russian troops on a recent Monday, highlighting the continuing intensity of ground operations alongside the aerial drone campaign. Fighting continues in Russia’s Kursk region, with Ukraine denying Russian claims of pushing Ukrainian troops out of positions there. This multipronged conflict has evolved into a war of attrition where both conventional and technological warfare tactics are deployed simultaneously, creating new challenges for civilian infrastructure protection.

As both nations continue to adapt their military strategies, the vulnerability of civilian airports and infrastructure has become increasingly apparent. The temporary shutdown of Moscow’s airports demonstrates how modern drone technology can disrupt critical transportation networks without necessarily causing direct casualties, creating economic and logistical challenges that extend far beyond the immediate impact zone of any attack.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR