Welfare CRACKDOWN – States Adopt New Rules!

A Florida think tank is revolutionizing welfare reform across America, pushing for stricter work requirements while critics warn of devastating impacts on the most vulnerable citizens.

At a Glance

  • The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), based in Naples, Florida, has grown into a powerful $15 million organization influencing welfare policy nationwide
  • FGA promotes conservative welfare reforms including work requirements for SNAP and Medicaid recipients
  • The organization has successfully influenced legislation in multiple states including Kansas, Kentucky, and Mississippi
  • Critics claim FGA’s policies create barriers for vulnerable citizens without effectively increasing employment
  • The “Make America Healthy Again” platform of the current administration aligns with several FGA initiatives

A Growing Conservative Influence on Public Assistance

The Foundation for Government Accountability has emerged as a significant force in reshaping America’s welfare system. Founded in 2011, this conservative think tank has expanded to a $15 million operation with approximately 64 employees. Based in Naples, Florida, the FGA has developed a systematic approach to influencing state legislatures across the country with policies aimed at restricting access to public assistance programs like SNAP (formerly food stamps) and Medicaid.

The organization provides model legislation to policymakers and maintains connections with conservative networks, including former Trump administration officials. As a “dark money” organization, the FGA is not required to disclose its donors, though reporting has linked it to conservative funding sources. The group is also associated with other influential conservative organizations like the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

“Some of these FGA proposals are such complex policies, it’s hard to argue against and to explain the ripple effects.”, Karen Siebert said.

The FGA’s State-Level Strategy

The FGA’s playbook typically involves passing state-level legislation to build momentum for broader federal reforms. Their most notable achievement has been implementing work requirements for public assistance programs. In Kansas, following the implementation of FGA-backed policies, the state saw significant reductions in SNAP caseloads. Similar measures have been adopted in Mississippi, West Virginia, and Kentucky, where House Bill 7 created quarterly reporting requirements for SNAP recipients and implemented work requirements for certain Medicaid beneficiaries.

FGA CEO Tarren Bragdon has stated the organization’s mission is to “free millions from government dependency and open the doors for them to chase their own American Dream.” The organization’s success has been bolstered by hiring lobbyists in multiple states and hosting events that attract conservative policymakers, including a notable gathering at Walt Disney World’s Swan and Dolphin Resort.

Alignment with “Make America Healthy Again”

The current administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” platform has created new opportunities for the FGA’s policy agenda. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has expressed support for legislation preventing federal funding for unhealthy foods, a position that aligns with FGA initiatives. Kennedy stated, “We’re not going to do that overnight. We’re going to do that in the next four years,” regarding plans to reform food assistance programs.

This alignment has strengthened the FGA’s position in policy discussions, particularly regarding restrictions on SNAP benefits for certain foods. The Trump administration’s 2020 budget and a proposed rule by the USDA also incorporated FGA-backed policies that could potentially affect millions of SNAP recipients nationwide. These measures reflect the growing influence of the organization’s philosophy of reducing dependency on government assistance.

“A national group and high-priced Kentucky lobbyists aggressively shopped a national agenda around slashing public benefits”, said Terry Brooks.

Criticism and Controversy

The FGA’s work has drawn significant criticism from various quarters. Democratic Kentucky Representative Mary Lou Marzian has stated, “It really seems like we’re trying to punish people for being poor.” Both Democratic and Republican economists have criticized the FGA’s research methodology, accusing the organization of cherry-picking data to support predetermined conclusions. Critics argue that the FGA’s policies create unnecessary barriers for vulnerable citizens and add administrative burdens to already overwhelmed state agencies.

Evidence from states implementing FGA-backed reforms has shown mixed results. In Kansas, increased child welfare cases were reported following benefit restrictions. In West Virginia, critics like community advocate Amy Jo Hutchison noted, “It’s easy to sit on the outside and think, ‘Why don’t people just get jobs?’ But it’s not that simple.” Studies suggest that work requirements often reduce program participation without significantly increasing employment, raising questions about the effectiveness of the FGA’s approach.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR